tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1675184707067447729.post2090457852042548317..comments2023-07-12T07:12:04.697-07:00Comments on The RAS Solution: Benchmarking of the HEC-RAS Two-Dimensional Hydraulic Modeling CapabilitiesChris G.http://www.blogger.com/profile/00354834185663924786noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1675184707067447729.post-16337488516530338692018-08-02T10:04:57.882-07:002018-08-02T10:04:57.882-07:00Hi Chris, Do you have any idea if the Hecras has g...Hi Chris, Do you have any idea if the Hecras has got faster in its most recent release?امیرhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12813876334650032218noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1675184707067447729.post-38453271662278665812016-12-20T08:17:19.367-08:002016-12-20T08:17:19.367-08:00My understanding is there have been improvements i...My understanding is there have been improvements in speed efficiency in 5.0.3 over 5.0. As far as the comparison to Mike and Tuflow, keep in mind RAS preserves the sub-grid bathymetry in its computation scheme. While in some cases this might make RAS slower than other software when comparing with the same mesh resolution, RAS is able to handle larger cell sizes with near similar results. This cuts the runtime down significantly, and in some cases faster than the other software applications. The Benchmarking document discusses this for Tests 4, 5 and 7.Chris G.https://www.blogger.com/profile/03272464763887890080noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1675184707067447729.post-18416978483823716302016-12-20T01:30:14.986-08:002016-12-20T01:30:14.986-08:00Hi i have read the benchmarking of HEC-RAS and i f...Hi i have read the benchmarking of HEC-RAS and i found that is very slow in comparison whit another modela for example.<br /><br />test 2: HEC (66 sec), Mike (9.6 sec), Tuflow - no GPU (7.5 sec)<br />test 4: HEC (87 sec) , Mike (32 sec), Tuflow - no GPU (47 sec)<br />test 5: HEC (100 sec), Mike (28 sec), Tuflow - no GPU (26 sec)<br />test 6B: HEC (161 sec), Mike (54.9), Tuflow - no GPU (38 sec)<br /><br />This run times is valid for HEC RAS 5.0, so my question is: What about current 5.0.3 version - is it faster? Because HEC seems to be very slow in comparison whit another models. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com